Skip to Primary Navigation

AI provenance: Building the evidence trail before complaints hit

High sums under the magnifying glass
Photo: Getty Images

Firms deploying AI in compliance are preserving descriptions of their systems; a regulator wants a record of one decision, on one file, on one day.

It comes without warning. A customer complains about a decision your firm made three years ago and AI was part of that decision. The Financial Ombudsman wants to know why the case was assessed the way it was. Can you show them?

Most firms think they can. They have architecture

Get full access, free for a month

Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and accessall content on GRIP – no payment details required.

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience