Rules Navigator

Sign in
Register

Data quality review of prudential regulatory reporting by MIFIDPRU investment firms

A general view of Tower 42 (NatWest Tower), 22 Bishopsgate (also known as Horizon 22), 8 Bishopsgate (sometimes referred to as 'the Jenga') and 1 Leadenhall Street commercial skyscrapers are seen behind the Royal Exchange by the Bank of England at Bank on January 29, 2026 in London, United Kingdom.
Commercial skyscrapers behind the Royal Exchange by the Bank of England in London. Photo: John Keeble/Getty Images

Eoghan Hartigan | Ocorian, Ian Morton | Ocorian, Jackie Domanska | Ocorian+1

2 min read
 Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window/tab)

The FCA’s findings from the review, its expectations, good practice, and areas for improvement.

The FCA continues to focus on the poor quality of data many firms are submitting through their regulatory returns.

Regulatory attention in this sphere can quickly escalate, with questions on returns often triggering wider concerns regarding a firm’s capital, liquidity, and the effectiveness of its governance and risk management framework.

Register for free to keep reading

To continue reading this article and unlock full access to GRIP, register now. You’ll enjoy free access to all content until our subscription service launches in early 2026.

  • Unlimited access to industry insights
  • Stay on top of key rules and regulatory changes with our Rules Navigator
  • Ad-free experience with no distractions
  • Regular podcasts from trusted external experts
  • Fresh compliance and regulatory content every day
Register for free
Sign in
, , , , , , ,