Skip to Primary Navigation

Victims of cryptocurrency theft cannot pursue claims in conversion

Bitcoin and sterling
Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

The judgment raises the question of whether there should be legislation to make a conversion-like cause of action apply to cryptocurrency.

In Ping Fai Yuen v Fun Yung Li & Another [2026] EWHC 532 (KB), the High Court has found that a victim of cryptocurrency theft cannot pursue a remedy in the tort of conversion. This is because OBG v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 is binding authority that only tangible assets can

Subscribe for free to continue reading

Read more articles like this one with our free plan, or get our Premium plan for access to all content – including our 5,000+ article archive, exclusive interviews, podcasts, and more.

Already have an account? Sign in