Skip to Primary Navigation

Victims of cryptocurrency theft cannot pursue claims in conversion

Bitcoin and sterling
Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

The judgment raises the question of whether there should be legislation to make a conversion-like cause of action apply to cryptocurrency.

In Ping Fai Yuen v Fun Yung Li & Another [2026] EWHC 532 (KB), the High Court has found that a victim of cryptocurrency theft cannot pursue a remedy in the tort of conversion. This is because OBG v Allan [2007] UKHL 21 is binding authority that only tangible assets can

Get full access, free for a month

Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and access
all content on GRIP – no payment details required.

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience