Skip to Primary Navigation

Name and shame 2.0: FCA seeks further views

St Paul's Cathedral as seen from a viewing point in the Tate Modern art gallery, London.
Photo: Tom Stoddart/Getty Images

The regulator has shared further clarity on name and shame plans with the caveat – “if the changes go ahead.” We ask stakeholders for their initial thoughts.

As trailed at a recent House of Lords Regulation Committee, the FCA has published the second phase of its consultation on proposals for, as the regulator’s press statement describes it, “a measured increase in transparency about its enforcement investigations.” So is this “name and shame 2.0” or more of the

The

Get full access, free for a month

Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and access
all content on GRIP – no payment details required.

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience