Skip to Primary Navigation

What Trump v Slaughter means for presidential authority and agency leadership

Image of the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC.
Photo: Kevin Carter/Getty Images

Reed Smith attorneys Julia Ensor and Rebecca Fike drew on their experience at the FTC and SEC respectively to weigh in on the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling.

In June, the Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-3, struck down a federal law that inhibits the president from firing members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), save in cases of “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” That law, a majority of the justices ruled, violates

Get full access, free for a month

This is a Premium article. Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and access all content on GRIP – no payment details required.

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience