Is deferred prosecution the right way forward for the SFO?

Should DPAs remain in the SFO toolbox or does the SFO need a stronger deterrent to stop fraud?

In the realm of fraud investigation and prosecution, a case involving the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities and nuances that surround Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs).

The SFO is currently attempting to enforce against a company for breaching a DPA, the first time

Free Trial

Register for free to keep reading.

To continue reading this article and unlock full access to GRIP, register now. You’ll enjoy free access to all content until our subscription service launches in early 2026.

  • Unlimited access to industry insights
  • Stay on top of key rules and regulatory changes with our Rules Navigator
  • Ad-free experience with no distractions
  • Regular podcasts from trusted external experts
  • Fresh compliance and regulatory content every day
Register for free Already a member? Sign in