Skip to Primary Navigation

OPINION: Why risk matters more than reward when setting incentives

People walk across the contemporary South Quay Footbridge over the dock, with the modern glass skyscrapers of the Canary Wharf financial district rising in the background
Photo: Getty Images

The primary challenge with designing executive pay is structuring rewards that link risk to long-term value while aligning with shareholder interests.

Most people think incentives are reward mechanisms. Increasingly, I think it is more accurate to view them as risk instruments. That may sound like an odd distinction, but it helps explain why so many debates about executive remuneration seem to generate more heat than light. We tend to assume that

Get full access, free for a month

Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and access
all content on GRIP – no payment details required.

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience