Skip to Primary Navigation

Skip to main content

Banks warn that regulators are too invasive, says IIF report

Headshot of a man wearing a headband magnifier with a red dollar symbol ($) superimposed on the glass over his right eye.
Photo: Alfred Gescheidt/Archive Photos/Getty Images

Jean Hurley

1 min read
 Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window/tab)

While banks generally have positive relationships with their prudential supervisory authorities, many have experienced common challenges.

Rule-setting without due process, inefficiencies, arbitrary decisions and limited challenge mechanisms are among areas of concern about supervisory practices in banks highlighted by The Institute of International Finance (IIF) in its latest report.

The IIF report, published on September 2, 2025 and titled Improving Supervisory Effectiveness – Addressing Concerning Trends in Bank Supervision

, , , , , , , ,

Get full access, free for a month

Start your 28-day free trial to continue reading and access
all content on GRIP – no payment details required.

Start free trial Sign in

What’s included:

  • Every new article, plus our 5,000+ archive
  • Daily regulatory insight and guidance
  • Exclusive interviews and in-depth analysis
  • Coverage of industry-leading events and conferences
  • All podcasts and videos, featuring industry experts
  • The full set of Rules Navigator tools
  • An ad-free experience