Rules Navigator

Register

FCA v BlueCrest Capital Management: Implications for regulated firms

Montage of the FCA sign
GRIP Montage: FCA

Robert Dedman | CMS, Simon Morris | CMS, Kushal Gandhi | CMS+1

 Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window/tab) Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window/tab)

Court of Appeal addresses the scope of the FCA’s powers under FSMA to impose redress requirements on firms and the jurisdiction of the Upper Tribunal.

On October 2, 2024, the Court of Appeal delivered a significant judgment in the case of Financial Conduct Authority v BlueCrest Capital Management (UK) LLP ([2024] EWCA Civ 1125).

This decision addresses:

  • the scope of the FCA’s powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) to impose redress requirements on
  • the
Free Trial

Register for free to keep reading.

To continue reading this article and unlock full access to GRIP, register now. You’ll enjoy free access to all content until our subscription service launches in early 2026.

  • Unlimited access to industry insights
  • Stay on top of key rules and regulatory changes with our Rules Navigator
  • Ad-free experience with no distractions
  • Regular podcasts from trusted external experts
  • Fresh compliance and regulatory content every day
Register for free Already a member? Sign in
, , , , , , , , ,
You may also like