City wins: FCA backs down on controversial “name and shame” plans

The regulator will proceed with muted transparency plans which received broader support. We look at what this means for the enforcement division.

The FCA has reversed its controversial plan to publicly “name and shame” companies under investigation, following a backlash from the City and government officials. The regulator will abandon its proposed “public interest test,” opting instead to maintain its existing, more stringent “exceptional circumstances” criteria for disclosure.

This reversal, confirmed in

Free Trial

Register for free to keep reading.

To continue reading this article and unlock full access to GRIP, register now. You’ll enjoy free access to all content until our subscription service launches in early 2026.

  • Unlimited access to industry insights
  • Stay on top of key rules and regulatory changes with our Rules Navigator
  • Ad-free experience with no distractions
  • Regular podcasts from trusted external experts
  • Fresh compliance and regulatory content every day
Register for free Already a member? Sign in